🔗 Share this article

Donald Trump's national security strategy presents a misguided assessment of the European Union. It claims that open-border policies and what it terms "progressive" policies pose an grave risk to the continent's identity. However, this argument is based on a fundamental misreading of the situation. The actual danger confronting Europe is not societal but economic and technological backwardness.

The Stark Growth Gap Separating Europe and the US

The data reveal a sobering picture. From 2008 and 2023, American economic output grew by eighty-seven percent, while a paltry thirteen and a half percent increase for the European Union. Over this period, EU GDP per capita fell from over three-quarters to just 50% of the US level. Strikingly, even the poorest US state now has a higher per capita income than several leading EU nations like France and Italy.

Currently, about 50% of the global top fifty technology firms are American, while a mere four are European.

The Technological Shortfall: A Critical Question

The growing disparity stems from stronger productivity growth in the US, fueled by technological innovation and better use of resources. The landscape of world technology leadership is overwhelmingly US-centric. In the last fifty years, 241 US firms have scaled into companies valued at more than $10bn, compared with just 14 in the European continent.

This gap raises a pressing question: As the competition for tomorrow's sectors like semiconductors, AI, and fusion energy, what is Europe stand? Most analysts agree it is largely a two-horse race involving the United States and China, with Europe entering at a clear disadvantage.

Underlying Factors of the Continent's Technological Lag

Several key factors explain this innovation chasm.

• Venture Capital: The United States has a far deeper and more dynamic network for financing new ventures. Europe has yet to establish a genuine unified investment market, a factor that limits the growth potential of new firms.
• Regulatory Fragmentation: Complex and divided rules hinder Europe. A American entrepreneur can introduce a service under one regulatory framework to access a market of hundreds of millions. The European Union, despite a larger population size, is split among 27 separate regimes, creating huge market obstacles.
• Cultural Attitudes: Views on entrepreneurial failure differ sharply. In parts of Europe, a startup's collapse was once met with penalties, whereas in the United States, it is often seen as a valuable lesson.
• Military Investment: The United States enjoys a deeply integrated innovation pipeline linking defense and academia. Europe's long-term lack of spending in military capabilities has weakened its capacity for breakthrough innovation.

The Road Ahead: Reasons for Cautious Optimism

In spite of these hurdles, there are causes for optimism. Policymakers are increasingly aware of the existential challenge and have started to propose substantial change. Key analyses on EU competitiveness and the internal market point to the necessity of sweeping reforms.

With the right policies and rule changes, Europe's strengths could support far greater levels of commercial innovation.

The continent retains considerable strengths: skilled human capital, top-tier schools and universities, and premier labs. Coupled with a large internal market and high savings rates, these elements could trigger a new wave of venture creation.

Importantly, even if the EU does not take the lead in creating next-generation tech, it can still dramatically increase productivity by adopting and adapting advancements from other regions.

An Inflection Point

Europe now stands at a critical crossroads. To paraphrase a famous line, decline often happens "slowly, then all at once". To date, the continent's slide in innovation has been gradual. But, if it fails to take bold steps to address its deep-seated problems, today's gradual weakening could turn into a sudden and irreversible decline in world influence.